Post by Tim MurrayPost by Tim MurrayMy neighbor just bought a Gateway T-1631 with an AMD Turion 64x2 chip and
it came with Vista Home Premium 32-bit.
Is this typical of Gateway to match 32-bit Windows with a 64-bit chip?
Are you al getting confused on the question? Not sure he is asking about
Windows/Vista version 32 or 64 bit
I think he may be asking about why he has a 64 bit processor with a 32 bit
OS.
What got me to look in the first place was that I noticed it was not a fast
machine at all. In fact, I thought it was rather sluggish. This was my very
first hands-on experience with Vista, and didn't know what to expect.
I had my old workhorse PowerBook G4 1.66MHz with 2GB next to it, and my
neighbors were oohing and ahhing over its apparent speed and responsiveness.
I didn't want the neighbors to feel bad about their purchase, so I
whitewashed it with some jargon crap about Unix.
When I saw the Gateway had that chip and 3GB RAM, I wondered if 32-bit
Windows on a 64-bit chip could behave like that. I guess I was asking from
the angle of wondering if my neighbor could complain and get a 64-bit for
free.
First, Vista is a slug compared to Windows XP when run on identical
hardware, and that explains Vista's underwhelming success in the
marketplace. Microsoft paid attention to eye candy with Vista and not
to common sense things like getting the job done that a computer is
intended to do. Microsoft shot itself in the foot with Vista and is now
madly trying to recover with Windows 7, which will be available by year
end or sooner.
Second, I understand that OS 9 and OS X were built on top of a Unix
kernel (BSD?), which explains why your PowerBook runs lean and mean.
The Unix and Linux crowd to which Apple is now firmly attached have done
sound software engineering for their operating system variants, and
Apple has done the same.
So you are comparing an operating system engineered (and actually
designed!) for good performance against software written by an
organization committed to bloatware forever to sell more and more new
hardware systems with ever more copies of Windows. If this sounds like
a condemnation of Microsoft's software engineering practices, well, it
is. Microsoft also has at least a few wrong-headed marketing types who
steered it down the treacherous Vista path.
The 64-bit version of Vista will do nothing to improve system
performance without a substantial memory upgrade. After all, the 64-bit
instructions are bigger than the 32-bit ones, not by a factor of two,
but programs are bigger, take up more disk space and take up more memory
when running. As for any speed advantage of 64-bit over 32-bit, ANY OS,
I'll believe it when I see it. The primary advantage of a 64-bit OS is
to provide greater memory addressability so that programs can be bigger
and can operate on ever larger data bases and elements of data (e.g.
PhotoShop and 12M pixel RAW photos)... Ben